Financial Modelling

A financial model should explain why the project makes money—and where it can run out of cash.

We build from operating drivers upward, then test the statements, debt schedule and return metrics for internal consistency and downside resilience.

A financial model should explain why the project makes money—and where it can run out of cash.
Model architecture

Start with physical drivers, not desired returns.

Capacity & CalendarFeedstock & YieldSaleable VolumePrice & CostDebt / WCStatementsReturns

Operating calendar

Hours, days, months, utilisation, downtime and ramp-up determine saleable tonnes—not nameplate capacity alone.

Material conversion

Incoming quantity, moisture, process loss and yield link feedstock procurement to finished product output.

Price basis

Product specification, rate convention, escalation and sales mix determine realised revenue assumptions.

Working capital cycle

Inventory build, receivables, supplier credit and seasonal stocking influence cash requirements before profit is realised.

Funding structure

Promoter contribution, term debt, moratorium, principal and CC utilisation are modelled separately.

Statement linkage

Profit, cash and balance-sheet movement reconcile so one attractive metric cannot hide a broken schedule elsewhere.

What we test

Returns are outputs. Thresholds are decisions.

IRR or NPV alone does not tell the promoter which operational variable deserves management attention. The model is used to locate the conditions that materially change viability.

Supply stress

What if feedstock becomes expensive?

Measure the margin and working-capital effect of raw-material price or transport escalation.

Demand stress

What if utilisation ramps slowly?

See how delayed volume affects fixed-cost absorption, debt service and cash generation.

Commercial stress

What selling price is actually required?

Identify the price and contribution threshold needed to meet the promoter’s financing constraints.

Biomass financial modelling framework
Financial model validation dashboard
Model integrity

Seven errors we refuse to let hide inside a projection

  • Sources of finance not reconciling with uses
  • Loan principal becoming negative or repaid beyond the original debt
  • Balance sheet failing to balance in a projected year
  • Closing cash not matching cash-flow movement
  • NPV calculated without the time-zero investment
  • Project return and promoter equity return mixed together
  • Debt service appearing comfortable only because working capital is understated
Decision outputs

The promoter should leave the model knowing the operating boundaries.

Capital requirement

How much fixed investment and working capital the project really needs.

%

Return profile

Project IRR, equity IRR and NPV calculated from the correct cash-flow perspective.

DSCR

Debt capacity

Whether projected cash generation supports the proposed repayment structure.

Limit

Stress threshold

The utilisation, price or raw-material movement that turns a comfortable case into a weak one.

Start with clarity

Use the model to define operating boundaries before negotiating the funding structure.

Share the available cost, capacity, price and feedstock assumptions for a model review.